Steve Kornacki's khakis: Sales of Gap pants soar on MSNBC coverage - Business Insider - Business Insider |
- Steve Kornacki's khakis: Sales of Gap pants soar on MSNBC coverage - Business Insider - Business Insider
- If You Can’t Get Away With Wearing Sweats Out, These Pants Are the Next Best Thing - Us Weekly
- Do you remember when girls weren't allowed to wear pants to school? - Duluth News Tribune
- From College to a Vogue Cover Story, Harry Styles and Bode Celebrate Senior Cords - Vogue
- 25 Best Performance Pants for Men 2020 - Men's Technical Trousers - Esquire.com
| Posted: 13 Nov 2020 01:27 AM PST
The US election may have highlighted deep divides in the nation, but something people seemed to agree on was that "chartthrob" Steve Kornacki looked good in his Gap khaki pants. The NBC News political correspondent wore khakis, a white shirt, and a striped tie every night for his election coverage. Viewers were enamored. HuffPost founder Arianna Huffington dubbed the pants "Khornakis" and called for fans to crowdfund a lifetime supply of khakis for Kornacki. And Gap says people are keen to copy the look. New York Magazine identified the pants as a $60 pair from the apparel brand, and since then sales have soared, Gap told Business Insider. Within a day, online sales of the khaki pants rose by about 90%. Gap also saw a "dramatic increase" in the number of people visiting its website, it added. Kornacki also wore the pants during his 2016 election coverage, but not the same pair, he was keen to stress. "I've got a bunch of them," he said on-air Wednesday. As well as his pants, Kornacki became known for the green-and-navy-striped tie he wore. But on Wednesday, the presenter revealed that the tie had been held together by staples, and had finally reached breaking point.
Twitter users replied encouraging him to auction off the tie for charity. Others said that they would frame it — or that Kornacki should give it to the Smithsonian.  |
| If You Can’t Get Away With Wearing Sweats Out, These Pants Are the Next Best Thing - Us Weekly Posted: 12 Nov 2020 12:00 AM PST Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships so we may receive compensation for some links to products and services. When we make plans to see friends, we're usually pretty pumped — especially these days. But then, right before we need to start getting dressed, the thought of our comfy couch and sweats suddenly seems far more appealing. Listen, we've all bailed once or twice — but making a habit out of it likely isn't the best idea. No one wants to be the friend with the reputation of bailing at the last minute! That's why we found an amazing solution that can at least help out in the comfort department. Allow Us to explain…  Get the Rekucci Women's Ease into Comfort Boot Cut Pant for prices starting at $30, available at Amazon! Please note, prices are accurate at the date of publication, November 12, 2020, but are subject to change. These pants may appear to be legitimate slacks when you see them, but that's all part of the illusion! They're actually made from a stretchy knit material that looks deceivingly like a pair of professional pants. They have a slip-on style and fit mid-rise on the hips, and while they may be slightly tighter than traditional sweats, they essentially feel like leggings on top and flares on the bottom. To take it a step further, these pants even have stitching that mimic the appearance of pockets in the front. Then, there's also stitching that's designed to look like a zipper! These dainty details make a truly convincing case that the pants are dressy enough to wear out for a multitude of occasions.  Get the Rekucci Women's Ease into Comfort Boot Cut Pant for prices starting at $30, available at Amazon! Please note, prices are accurate at the date of publication, November 12, 2020, but are subject to change. The best part? Well, there are so many color options and prints available. There's a pair of these pants to suit anyone's personal tastes — from bright and bold hues, to sleek muted shades. Currently, there are over 7,000 shoppers who stand by these bad boys, so it's safe to say they're the real deal. Even on your laziest of days, these pants will get you out the door in style! See it: Get the Rekucci Women's Ease into Comfort Boot Cut Pant for prices starting at $30, available at Amazon! Please note, prices are accurate at the date of publication, November 12, 2020, but are subject to change. Not what you're looking for? Check out more styles from Rekucci and shop all of the clothing, shoes and jewelry available at Amazon! Don't forget to check out all of Amazon's Daily Deals here! Check out more of our picks and deals here! This post is brought to you by Us Weekly's Shop With Us team. The Shop With Us team aims to highlight products and services our readers might find interesting and useful, such as face masks, self tanners, Lululemon-style leggings and all the best gifts for everyone in your life. Product and service selection, however, is in no way intended to constitute an endorsement by either Us Weekly or of any celebrity mentioned in the post. The Shop With Us team may receive products free of charge from manufacturers to test. In addition, Us Weekly receives compensation from the manufacturer of the products we write about when you click on a link and then purchase the product featured in an article. This does not drive our decision as to whether or not a product or service is featured or recommended. Shop With Us operates independently from advertising sales team. We welcome your feedback at ShopWithUs@usmagazine.com. Happy shopping!  |
| Do you remember when girls weren't allowed to wear pants to school? - Duluth News Tribune Posted: 12 Nov 2020 04:00 PM PST Some of your mothers and grandmothers had it worse, not being allowed to wear pants to school. (Your fathers and grandfathers had rules, too, like having to wear belts, no jeans and no long hair. But today we're talking about the girls.) Recently, Forum Communications asked readers on Facebook to share their memories and experiences with the "no pants" rules for girls. We received more than 100 replies representing experiences at schools all over the region and the country. Some commonalities started to surface amongst the respondents who agreed to let us use their stories. Snowbanks and skirtsGirls in the northern United States bore the brunt of the "no pants" rule, freezing their knees when the mercury dropped below zero.  "Before they changed the policy, we would always wear long pants to walk to school and to stay warm. When we got to our lockers and pulled our pants off, we just prayed that we didn't pull our underwear down, too." — Beth Bouley, Grand Forks.  Many girls in the upper Midwest wore pants under their skirts to keep their legs warm in the winter, but then removed the pants once they got to school. Submitted photo "My mom picked me up from Clara Barton (Elementary School) in a blizzard and was wearing a miniskirt and pantyhose, as she had come straight from NDSU, where she was taking classes toward her Master's. She froze!" — Dick Lunde, Fargo native, now living on the East Coast. "My mom would sew a skirt or dress and matching pants that we wore on the walk to and from school. We took the pants off once we were at school. Crazy!" — Jennifer Daul, Fargo native, now living in the Twin Cities. "We had to be mindful of bringing pants to wear for gym class under our dresses. One fateful winter's day, I forgot to bring pants and it was relay race day. Since I had to walk four blocks to school, all I had was my nylon bulky snow pants. I can distinctly hear my snow pants giving this 'zoop, zoop, zoop' sound that still resounds in my ear as we ran the length of the gym. Even worse was those funny little scooters, about 15 inch square, rounded edges, wheels about two inches off of the ground. It was all foot power. My snow pants kept catching under the wheels and throwing me off the scooter." — Deb McShane, Fargo. "My family moved from New Rockford, N.D., to Hazen, N.D., in 1972, and the big incentive to the girls in my family was that we could wear pants to school in Hazen. We still would have had to wear dresses in elementary school in New Rockford. Pants under the dresses to keep legs warm in winter." — Dawn Rye Streifel, Fargo.  Mini-skirts and mini-dresses were gaining in popularity in the 1960's, but girls at most schools at the time, would have been in violation of the school dress code because the skirt would not touch the ground if she kneels. Wikimedia Commons Not too short or longGirls in school back then had to play Goldilocks. Their skirts had to be "just right." Not too short. "You had to kneel, and if the skirt didn't touch the floor, it was too short." — Cathi Chial, Fargo. Or too long. "My sisters got suspended for wearing 'granny dresses' during a time in which any 'weird clothing' was considered taboo." — Mark Covey, Moorhead, Minn. The proper length by most accounts was knee to mid-calf. RELATED: Controversial as it may be, it has to be said: Enough with the WFH sweatpants. Sometimes dress codes were relaxed during extracurricular activities. These girls from Moorhead High School in the late 60's show the variety of other clothing options including a pantsuit, culottes and shorts. Submitted photoSkirts, skorts, culottes and gauchosGirls tired of wearing skirts to school tried to work the system a little by wearing skirt alternatives, including skorts (a pair of shorts with a fabric panel resembling a skirt covering the front) or culottes or gauchos (mid-length pants, that because of their fullness, resemble a skirt). "I remember those days. In 1974, I was 13 and wearing a skort. Two young doormen wouldn't allow me into a gathering because it may look like a skirt, but because there were shorts built in, I was in violation of the dress code and denied entry." — Diana Hall, Fargo.  Girls who were tired of wearing skirts to school tried to get away with wearing skorts, culottes or gauchos which resemble a skirt, but are sewn like pants. In most districts, skorts, culottes and gauchos violated the dress code. Submitted photo. "It was very controversial whether culottes and skorts were classified as a skirt or shorts. Loved the culottes!" — Colleen Riley Nakamura, Fargo native now living in Seattle. "My sister was sent home from Agassiz (Junior High) for wearing culottes. I think she was in eighth grade, which would have made it 1971." — Marsha Woodward Johansen, Fargo. Most girls attending American schools prior to 1970 were required to wear skirts or dresses to class. Pants were not allowed. Most likely the girl on the left would have been in violation of the policy since she is wearing shorts. iStock The issue started to boil over in the '60sLike today, the amount of tolerance for violating the dress code varied among those enforcing it. But clearly by the 1960s, a huge generation gap was emerging as evidenced by this particularly (unintentionally) amusing story from the Fort Worth Star Telegram dated Dec. 3, 1965. The Associated Press reporter clearly had an agenda right from the first sentence. "The perennial contest between the nation's free-wheeling school kids and the teachers who think pupils should look like people was in full swing Thursday." The ball-of-fun reporter goes on to write that the teachers "as usual" had the best arguments against "funny" haircuts (AKA The Beatles mop top) and "exotic" or "unorthodox" clothing. He or she writes that "two minxes named Ruth Ann Skinner and Lana Simms flummoxed" authorities at their school in Missouri by switching things up in the skirt length department. "Instead of wearing them thigh length, Ruth Ann, 15 and Lana, 16, sauntered into class in grandmotherly demureness clear down to their ankles," wrote the reporter. Take note: within less than 100 words and two paragraphs, the two girls were called both "minxes" and "grandmotherly." Pardon me, Miss Steinem, Ruth Ann and Lana from Missouri are on the phone for you.  Ruth Hansten, a student at Fargo North, wrote poetry for the school yearbook and called herself a bit of a "rabblerouser" after she and a friend complained about the inequality of dress-wearing to administrators in the early '70's. The dress code was changed shortly after Hansten and her friend complained about getting frostbitten knees from skirt-wearing. Submitted photo. Rules relaxed around 1970While every school district is different with dress codes sometimes imposed by administrators or school boards, it appears the "no pants-wearing" rule for girls started to change around 1970. It was not a coincidence the women's liberation movement was going full steam. Australian pop star Helen Reddy recorded the soon-to-be megahit "I Am Woman" the next year. In many cases, the dress code was changed after students signed petitions or rebelled. "Yes! We held a little 'protest' in sixth grade at Horace Mann (1970-71) and were finally allowed to wear pants. Before that we could only wear them under skirts for walking to school in the winter." — Rose Dunn, Moorhead. "I revolutionized the dress code for the city of Fargo public schools when, in 1969, as a fifth grader at Horace Mann Elementary, I wore my little green corduroy pants to school. I had the backing of my mom, who told me that if I was sent home from school, that was fine with her. My fifth grade teacher, Miss Varlow, sent me to the principal's office. The principal, Dennis Holmgren (to borrow a Joe Bidenism, 'God love him') sent me back to class. By the next year, all girls and women (including Miss Varlow) were wearing pants to school." — Jill Fahrlander, Fargo native now living in Madison, WI. "I remember that my friend Pat Caraway Dobier and I were rabble-rousers. My father was the principal at South High across town and of course that meant that I had to prove myself independent! Apparently we went into the principal or Miss Gladys Carney's office (girls counselor) to show that we had frost bitten knees from walking to school on a cold day. I do recall arguments about inequality between the boys and the girls (which I'm sure probably fell on deaf ears), but they did see the frozen knees as a health problem." — Ruth Hansten, Fargo native now living in California. "I went to the junior high principal to advocate for the wearing of 'hot pants.' That, of course. lead to a lifetime of activism." — Laurie Winterfeldt, Moorhead.  The requirement for girls to wear skirts or dresses to school ended in most places by the early '70's but even after that, most girls and often boys, were not allowed to wear jeans to school. So girls opted for pantsuits or coordinated shirt and slack sets. Wikimedia Commons OK, but still no jeansEven as districts started to relax the "no pants' rule, many held firm to the no jeans policy, often for both boys and girls. In some cases, jeans were only allowed on Fridays, "game days" or other special days. "I graduated in 1972 from Clifford-Galesburg High School. We had to wear dresses until 1970. At that time, we could start wearing pantsuits, which consisted of pants with a matching tunic, usually made of a polyester fabric. Everyone was always neat as a pin! No holes or stains. Boys had to wear pants with their shirts tucked in, and a belt. 'Leave it to Beaver' days!" — Kathy Haakenson, Horace, N.D. "I grew up in Minneapolis, and we could wear polyester pant suits in about 1970. One of mine was royal blue. The first time we could wear jeans to school was on the first Earth Day in 1970 because we were outside picking up garbage." — Barb Chamberlain, Moorhead.  College students in 1954. Nothing says 'warm winter fun' than building a snowman while wearing a skirt. Duke University Archives. It wasn't just high school"My mom attended NDSU around 1964-66, and she was required to wear a dress if she stepped foot into the Home Ec building. She said even if they were only walking through. She went back in 1975 to finish her degree, and she no longer had that requirement." — Jillain Veil-Ehnert, Horace. "I remember a friend who attended the College of St. Benedict in 1964-68, and she told stories of the 'Bennies' being required to wear a hat, hose and gloves if they ever went off the campus, including on the bus to St. Joe's or St. Cloud." — Terri Trickle, Moorhead.  At least two girls in this photo taken in the early '70's would have been violating many school dress codes from just a few years earlier. The girl in the front is wearing jeans, while the girl behind her is wearing an "unorthodox" long skirt. Submitted photo The times they are a-changin'Even after the rules relaxed some, "old school" teachers weren't ready to embrace the change. But the girls were. Kathy Vitalis Hoffman, originally from Fargo but now a pastor in Maryland, says she remembers the day the dress code changed in 1970. "We were told about it at school when we arrived. Our teacher, however, told us that we should continue to wear dresses because that is what nice girls did. Most of us went home for lunch, and we returned to school with pants on."  |
| From College to a Vogue Cover Story, Harry Styles and Bode Celebrate Senior Cords - Vogue Posted: 13 Nov 2020 05:04 AM PST "Harry is someone who celebrates individuality, of course, but he really celebrates customization through personalization," Bode explained. "And we've done custom pieces for him before. But he's so unique and really he loves this idea of storytelling." He might be the first guy to grace the cover of Vogue solo but Styles isn't the only cool kid in custom Bode cords. In honor of National Corduroy Day, Bode hosted a socially-distanced Senior Cord soirée at her Lower East Side shop. "My friends and I have always drawn on each other's clothes," Bode said. "I have a shirt that I had every member of my family sign. So, it has always been a part of who I am."  A scene from the Bode National Corduroy Day event. Courtesy of Bode.  Illustration work in progress. Courtesy of Bode. "I think there's this return to the idea that you're curating your wardrobe—not just for a short period of time, you're doing it for your life," she continued. "And that's something that we love to encourage people to do. Just a month ago we made a jacket for someone, and he said, 'I can't wait to give this to my son!' And his son's less than a year old!" What will come of Styles's Bode corduroys? Only time will tell.  |
| 25 Best Performance Pants for Men 2020 - Men's Technical Trousers - Esquire.com Posted: 13 Nov 2020 07:39 AM PST  We are, it should be noted, living through exceptionally odd times. In general, sure, but when it comes to pants in particular. Last week we gleefully trumpeted the long-awaited return of the cargo pant (!) and this week I'm back with more breaking news straight from the streets, aka the number one source for all pants-related updates. It's called hard-hitting investigative reporting, people. I'm the Woodward and Bernstein of the pants beat, baby. Right now, the streets are telling me that the rumors are true: Swishy pants are back. But we don't call them that anymore. Remember on the first day of eighth grade when Bobby needed to establish he only wanted to go by Robert so he had his mom call the teacher ahead of time to alert the rest of the class? It's sort of like that, except The pants I'm talking about here are of the highly durable, lightweight variety and are often made out of a ripstop fabric, i.e. one that's been specially reinforced during the weaving process to make it particularly resistant to all kinds of abrasion. And yes, some of them still make that telltale rustling sound that announces your imminent arrival in any room long before you actually walk in. But they also tend to come with a sick array of technical details you can brag to all your boys about, including things like elasticized waistbands, bonded seams, hidden zippers, a surplus of pockets (so, so many pockets), and plenty of other sweet specs that'll have the gorpiest among us going nuts in no time whatsoever. Sure, you probably don't need your pants to do very much these days. But who are you to argue with the streets? Take it from me, buddy: That's a fight you're going to lose every time. Swish, swish. Advertisement - Continue Reading Below This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io Advertisement - Continue Reading Below  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from "pants" - Google News. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
0 Yorumlar